Look up your property to see your old vs. new assessed value, whether the Assessor has already adjusted your value since the revaluation, how your increase compares to the rest of town and your street, whether your tax bill is likely to go up or down, and how it compares against similar homes and recent sales.
Loading property dataβ¦
Estimate only. The exemption figure comes from the Town's August 10 commitment file, so it is the actual amount on your parcel rather than an assumption; under the old assessment it is scaled to about 57% of that, since exemptions scale with the certified ratio. The official rate is set by the Council.
Tap a column heading to sort. Tap any address to open that property.
This section reports what the numbers show. It does not tell you what to do about them, and nothing here establishes that any particular assessment is wrong. Values are set as of April 1 and the Assessor has said publicly that further adjustments are expected in 2028.
Look up any property above and open "Compare this property in detail" to see both measures run for that address. Styles here are groups; an individual house can sit anywhere within its group.
Areas are the Town's assessing map sheets, labeled by their main roads. "Change" is the median value increase for homes in that area; areas above the town median tend to see tax increases, those below tend to see decreases.
If your assessment is accurate but your bill is rising, these reduce what you actually pay. A revaluation appeal can't help an accurate assessment, but these can:
Verify current amounts and eligibility with the Town Assessor; this is general information, not tax advice.
Your bill is moving for two separate reasons this year, and they are worth keeping apart, because only one of them is the revaluation.
Reason 1 β the revaluation decides your share. A revaluation by itself is not a tax increase. The town collects the same total, and because every property is now valued higher, the mil rate (tax per $1,000) drops to match. What moves your slice is how your increase compares to everyone else's:
Reason 2 β the budget decides the total. Redistributing the current levy across the new values would need a rate near $13.13. The Assessor has recommended $14.12. That difference, about 7.5%, is the town raising more money than last year. It applies to everyone, whatever their value did, and it is set by the budget rather than by the revaluation.
So a home whose value rose exactly at the town average will see "about the SAME" from the revaluation and still get a bill roughly 7.5% higher. Both things are true at once. The estimate above shows you the two pieces separately.
Two sources. Building characteristics, the pre-revaluation value, and the revaluation as originally published come from the Town's property database (Vision Government Solutions), read on June 13, 2026. Current values, and per-parcel exemption amounts, come from the Town Assessor's commitment check file dated August 10, 2026. The two are joined on the Town's parcel id. Where they disagree, the August figure is the current one and the June figure is shown as "originally proposed" β that difference is exactly what the adjustment sections report.
Break-even multiplier (A) = (sum of all current values) ÷ (sum of all pre-reval values), which comes to about 1.92. Revenue-neutral mil rate = current rate ÷ A = about $13.13; that is the rate at which the town would collect exactly what it collects now. Your estimated new tax = (current value β your exemptions) × the rate ÷ 1,000, using the Assessor's recommended $14.12 unless you change it.
Splitting the change. The "because the revaluation changed your share" line is your new taxable value at the revenue-neutral $13.13, minus your old tax. The "because the town is raising more" line is your new taxable value times the gap between $14.12 and $13.13. Summing that second line across every taxable parcel, and separately summing actual old bills against actual new bills, both give the same answer: the recommended rate raises about 7.5% more than revenue-neutral.
Appeal comparisons use building characteristics (living area, year built, style) from the same database. The equity test compares your assessed value per square foot to similar homes; the market test compares recent sale prices of similar homes to their assessments. The style test groups homes into five size bands and compares each style's median $/sq ft to the median for all single-family homes in the same band, so a style isn't flagged merely for being made up of smaller or larger houses.
What's included: the break-even covers all taxable parcels (about 3,690 after excluding tax-exempt town/church/school land and TIF-sheltered utility accounting entries). It includes commercial and utility property β notably Central Maine Power and Summit Natural Gas parcels, which are valued by the regulated-utility method and barely changed; that flat utility value is real and is part of why the burden shifts toward homes. Fourteen parcels created since the revaluation (new construction and lot splits) appear in search but are left out of the break-even, since they have no earlier value to compare against.
Known limitations: the new mil rate is an estimate near $13; the actual rate depends on the budget the Council adopts and on how exemptions are applied. The style-versus-sales test rests on a few dozen sales per style, so read its ranking rather than its exact percentages. The "share of homes paying more" is an estimate in the ~65β70% range β robust in direction (most homes pay more because commercial and utility value lagged) but not exact. Exemption amounts are now taken from the Town's own file rather than assumed, which makes individual dollar figures much closer than they were, but they still don't model a change in your exemption status.
A revaluation only reports what the market did β it isn't where most of the fairness questions actually get decided. Here's what is, and isn't, within the town's control:
The main constraint: Maine requires property to be assessed at market ("just") value and taxed at a single, uniform rate. Unlike some states, Maine does not allow a higher tax rate on commercial property, so the town cannot simply tax businesses more.
An important nuance: commercial buildings genuinely rose far less in value than homes. If they are correctly assessed at their (lower) market value, paying a smaller share is the system working as intended, not an error. The fixable questions are whether commercial and utility property are assessed at their true market value, and how sheltered value is treated.
General information from a resident, not legal or tax advice; confirm specifics with the Town Assessor, Town Council, and town attorney.
Assessed values current as of the Town's August 10, 2026 commitment file; property characteristics as of June 13, 2026. Tax estimates use the $14.12 mil rate the Assessor has recommended β the Council sets the final rate. The Town's public VGSI lookup had not yet been updated to the August figures when this data was pulled, so for the roughly 900 parcels the Assessor adjusted, the value here is newer than the one VGSI shows. Unofficial estimate, built by a resident, not affiliated with the Town of Cumberland. Assumes a revenue-neutral revaluation; does not account for changes in exemption status, Tree Growth/open-space, further adjustments, or the budget the Council adopts. Always verify with the Town Assessor's office.